[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using DNS for SSM

To: eckert@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Using DNS for SSM
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@procket.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:11:36 -0800
CC: lindahl@ack.berkeley.edu, jschoch@sprint.net, ssm-interest@external.cisco.com
In-reply-to: <200102152358.PAA11155@cisco.com> (message from Toerless Eckerton Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:58:09 -0800 (PST))
References: <200102152358.PAA11155@cisco.com>

>> Can someone explain to me what the urgent need for SSM specific
>> channel addresses is ? I agree that it is a nice-to-have,

    I don't see any urgency. What gave you that idea?

>> channel addresses is ? I agree that it is a nice-to-have,
>> but such a mapping alone does not allow a user who wants
>> to receive a channel to simply type the address and then receive
>> the content.

    Sure it does. Just like most apps, you can type a DNS name or an address.
    The Schoch proposal is not forcing apps to use this.

    Toerless, are you proposing SDP attributes in a DNS record.   ;-)

Dino

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using DNS for SSM
  - From: Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live.com>
- Re: Using DNS for SSM
  - From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>

References:
- Re: Using DNS for SSM
  - From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Using DNS for SSM
Next by Date: Re: Using DNS for SSM
Prev by thread: Re: Using DNS for SSM
Next by thread: Re: Using DNS for SSM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread