[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Using DNS for SSM
> I don't see the rationale for making the source the primary
> key and the
> channels the secondary keys. I think apps will more likely know the
> channel (DNS name) and want a listing of servers.
This method does not prevent multicast providers from configuring multiple A
records if they have multiple servers for one channel. Users only need to
know the channel name and DNS server will resolve to one of the A records.
> Have you considered using some variation of SRV records so
> that you can
> specify port numbers per server? Depending on how you do it,
> this would
> eliminate the need for a magic ".mcast." in the hostname.
No, we haven't considered that. We'll look into it more.
Thanks!
Sunny
>
> > Jeff Schoch jschoch@sprint.net
> > Operations Engineering 703-689-7716
>
> S
>
> | | Stephen Sprunk, K5SSS, CCIE #3723
> :|: :|: Network Design Consultant, GSOLE
> :|||: :|||: New office: RCDN2 in Richardson, TX
> .:|||||||:..:|||||||:. Email: ssprunk@cisco.com
>
>